𝗞𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗮 𝗠𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗵 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗴 𝗗𝗶 𝗣𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗴 𝟭𝟰 𝗙𝗲𝗯𝗿𝘂𝗮𝗿𝗶 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟰 𝗗𝗶 𝗣𝗮𝗽𝘂𝗮

𝙈𝙚𝙨𝙖𝙠 𝙔𝙖𝙪𝙣𝙜, Dosen Universitas Cenderawasih/Pendeta

K𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙪 𝙠𝙞𝙩𝙖 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙙𝙞 𝙗𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙤𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙖𝙨𝙞 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙖 𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙩 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠 𝙙𝙞 𝘼𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙖 𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙖𝙡𝙣𝙮𝙖, 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙙𝙞 𝙄𝙣𝙙𝙤𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙞𝙖, 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙧𝙖 𝙠𝙝𝙪𝙨𝙪𝙨 𝙙𝙞 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖, 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙪𝙠 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙖 𝙢𝙤𝙩𝙞𝙛 𝙙𝙞𝙗𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙠 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖 𝙢𝙖𝙟𝙪 𝙨𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞 𝙘𝙖𝙡𝙤𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙜𝙤𝙩𝙖 𝙡𝙚𝙜𝙞𝙨𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙛 ( 𝙘𝙖𝙡𝙚𝙜), 𝙠𝙞𝙩𝙖 𝙖𝙠𝙖𝙣 𝙩𝙚𝙢𝙪𝙠𝙖𝙣 𝙨𝙚𝙗𝙪𝙖𝙝 𝙠𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙠𝙨 𝙥𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙖𝙝𝙪𝙖𝙣 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙗𝙖𝙞𝙠 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙛𝙖𝙖𝙩.

𝘿𝙞 𝘼𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙖, 𝙨𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙥 𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙩 𝙖𝙩𝙖𝙪 𝙬𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙖 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙙𝙖𝙛𝙩𝙖𝙧 𝙘𝙖𝙡𝙚𝙜, 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖 𝙨𝙪𝙙𝙖𝙝 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙞 𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖𝙢 𝙟𝙚𝙟𝙖𝙠 𝙙𝙞 𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙖 𝙢𝙖𝙨𝙮𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙠𝙖𝙩. 𝙈𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖 𝙨𝙪𝙙𝙖𝙝 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙡𝙞𝙗𝙖𝙩 𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙖𝙙𝙫𝙤𝙠𝙖𝙨𝙞 𝙗𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙖𝙠 𝙞𝙨𝙪 - 𝙞𝙨𝙪 𝙙𝙞 𝙢𝙖𝙨𝙮𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙠𝙖𝙩. 𝙆𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙖 𝙞𝙨𝙪 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖 𝙖𝙙𝙫𝙤𝙠𝙖𝙨𝙞 𝙨𝙪𝙙𝙖𝙝 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙖𝙧 𝙙𝙞 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙡𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙚𝙩𝙖𝙥𝙞 𝙗𝙚𝙡𝙪𝙢 𝙙𝙞𝙚𝙠𝙨𝙚𝙠𝙪𝙨𝙞 𝙙𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙢 𝙨𝙖𝙩𝙪 𝙧𝙚𝙜𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙨𝙞, 𝙢𝙖𝙠𝙖 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖 𝙥𝙪𝙩𝙪𝙨𝙠𝙖𝙣 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙪𝙠 𝙢𝙖𝙨𝙪𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙧𝙡𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣 𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙖𝙣 𝙙𝙖𝙛𝙩𝙖𝙧 𝙨𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞 𝙘𝙖𝙡𝙚𝙜. 𝘼𝙜𝙖𝙧 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖 𝙗𝙞𝙨𝙖 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙡𝙞𝙗𝙖𝙩 𝙡𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙨𝙪𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙠𝙨𝙚𝙠𝙪𝙨𝙞 𝙨𝙚𝙗𝙪𝙖𝙝 𝙧𝙚𝙜𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙨𝙞 𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙨𝙪 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖 𝙖𝙙𝙫𝙤𝙠𝙖𝙨𝙞. 𝙄𝙩𝙪 𝙢𝙤𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙖𝙨𝙞 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙧𝙖 𝙪𝙢𝙪𝙢 𝙙𝙖𝙧𝙞 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙖 𝙘𝙖𝙡𝙚𝙜 𝙙𝙞 𝘼𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙖.

𝙎𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙣𝙮𝙖, 𝙙𝙞 𝙄𝙣𝙙𝙤𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙞𝙖 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙧𝙖 𝙠𝙝𝙪𝙨𝙪𝙨 𝙙𝙞 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖, 𝙢𝙖𝙮𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙨 𝙘𝙖𝙡𝙚𝙜 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙪𝙣𝙘𝙪𝙡 𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙟𝙚𝙡𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙥𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙪, 𝙨𝙚𝙟𝙖𝙪𝙝 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙨𝙖𝙮𝙖 𝙥𝙖𝙝𝙖𝙢𝙞 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙠𝙚𝙩𝙖𝙝𝙪, 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙞 𝙢𝙤𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙖𝙨𝙞 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙪𝙠 𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙟𝙖𝙙𝙞𝙠𝙖𝙣 𝙧𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙝 𝙋𝙖𝙧𝙡𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣 𝙨𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞 𝙡𝙖𝙥𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙖𝙣 𝙠𝙚𝙧𝙟𝙖 𝙗𝙖𝙧𝙪 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙪𝙠 𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙟𝙖𝙧 𝙠𝙚𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙖𝙣 𝙚𝙠𝙤𝙣𝙤𝙢𝙞 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙪𝙝𝙞 𝙠𝙚𝙗𝙪𝙩𝙪𝙝𝙖𝙣 𝙠𝙚𝙡𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙖 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙠𝙚𝙡𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙤𝙠.

𝙅𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙤𝙣 𝙠𝙖𝙢𝙥𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙚 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖, 𝙗𝙚𝙠𝙚𝙧𝙟𝙖 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙪𝙠 𝙧𝙖𝙠𝙮𝙖𝙩, 𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙖𝙗𝙙𝙞 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙪𝙠 𝙧𝙖𝙠𝙮𝙖𝙩, 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙨𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙮𝙖, 𝙖𝙙𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙝 𝙟𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙤𝙣 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠 𝙤𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙠𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙖𝙗𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙙. 𝙏𝙞𝙙𝙖𝙠 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙞 𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖𝙢 𝙟𝙚𝙟𝙖𝙠 𝙖𝙙𝙫𝙤𝙠𝙖𝙨𝙞 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙤𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙣 𝙧𝙖𝙠𝙮𝙖𝙩, 𝙩𝙚𝙩𝙖𝙥𝙞 𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙞 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙠 𝙗𝙚𝙠𝙚𝙧𝙟𝙖 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙪𝙠 𝙧𝙖𝙠𝙮𝙖𝙩.

𝙋𝙤𝙥𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙨 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙪𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙗𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙖𝙠, 𝙖𝙙𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙝 𝙢𝙤𝙙𝙖𝙡 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙪𝙠 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙥𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙨𝙞 𝙨𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙖 𝙧𝙖𝙠𝙮𝙖𝙩 𝙢𝙚𝙡𝙖𝙡𝙪𝙞 𝙟𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙤𝙣 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠 𝙤𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙠𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖.

𝘼𝙥𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙜𝙞 𝙙𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙢 𝙠𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙠𝙨 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖, 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙖 𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙩 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙖𝙞 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙠𝙖𝙣 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠 𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙨. 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖 𝙥𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙝 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖. 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖 𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙖𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙠𝙖𝙣 𝙝𝙖𝙠 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖. 𝙋𝙖𝙙𝙖𝙝𝙖𝙡 𝙢𝙤𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙖𝙨𝙞 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖 𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙣 𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙟𝙖𝙙𝙞 𝙘𝙖𝙡𝙤𝙣 𝙠𝙤𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙩𝙤𝙧 𝙗𝙖𝙧𝙪 𝙙𝙞 𝙧𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙝 𝙧𝙖𝙠𝙮𝙖𝙩, 𝙧𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙝 𝙋𝙖𝙧𝙡𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣.

𝙅𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙖𝙣 𝙡𝙖𝙜𝙞 𝙥𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙝 𝙠𝙤𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙩𝙤𝙧 𝙟𝙖𝙙𝙞 𝙥𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙞𝙣 𝙙𝙞 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖. 𝙊𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖 𝙨𝙪𝙙𝙖𝙝 𝙡𝙖𝙢𝙖 𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙖 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙝𝙞𝙙𝙪𝙥 𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙠𝙞𝙣 𝙙𝙞 𝙖𝙩𝙖𝙨 𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙝 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙠𝙚𝙠𝙖𝙮𝙖𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙮𝙖 𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙧𝙞.

𝙆𝙞𝙩𝙖 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙢𝙖𝙝 𝙪𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙙𝙖𝙧𝙞 𝙠𝙤𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙩𝙤𝙧, 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙠𝙞𝙩𝙖 𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙠𝙖𝙣 𝙨𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙖 𝙠𝙞𝙩𝙖 𝙠𝙚 𝙠𝙤𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙩𝙤𝙧 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙪𝙠 𝙙𝙪𝙙𝙪𝙠𝙞 𝙠𝙪𝙧𝙨𝙞 𝙙𝙚𝙬𝙖𝙣. 𝙆𝙞𝙩𝙖 𝙞𝙠𝙪𝙩 𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙜𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙟𝙖𝙬𝙖𝙗 𝙖𝙩𝙖𝙨 𝙥𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙖𝙣, 𝙠𝙚𝙨𝙪𝙨𝙖𝙝𝙖𝙣 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙠𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙣 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖.

𝙈𝙚𝙣𝙪𝙧𝙪𝙩 𝙅𝙤𝙝𝙣 𝙍𝙖𝙬𝙡𝙨 𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙚𝙤𝙧𝙞 𝙠𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙞𝙡𝙖𝙣, 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙚𝙗𝙪𝙩𝙠𝙖𝙣 𝙗𝙖𝙝𝙬𝙖 𝙠𝙤𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙨𝙞 𝙨𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙠 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙟𝙖𝙙𝙞 𝙙𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙢 𝙨𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙥 𝙠𝙖𝙡𝙞 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙝𝙚𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙖𝙣 𝙥𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙪. 𝘿𝙞𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙖 𝙠𝙤𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙨𝙞 𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙡𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙨𝙪𝙣𝙜 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙧𝙖 𝙨𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙠, 𝙠𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙠𝙨 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙖, 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙙𝙞𝙡𝙖𝙠𝙪𝙠𝙖𝙣 𝙤𝙡𝙚𝙝 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙖 𝙥𝙞𝙝𝙖𝙠 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙡𝙞𝙗𝙖𝙩 𝙡𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙨𝙪𝙣𝙜 𝙙𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙢 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙚𝙨 𝙥𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙪.

𝙍𝙖𝙠𝙮𝙖𝙩 𝙨𝙪𝙙𝙖𝙝 𝙩𝙖𝙝𝙪 𝘾𝙖𝙡𝙚𝙜 𝙖𝙩𝙖𝙪 𝙥𝙚𝙟𝙖𝙗𝙖𝙩 𝙊𝘼𝙋 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙞𝙙𝙖𝙠 𝙥𝙪𝙣𝙮𝙖 𝙠𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙨 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙠𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙚𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙞. 𝙏𝙞𝙙𝙖𝙠 𝙖𝙙𝙖 𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖𝙢 𝙟𝙚𝙟𝙖𝙠 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙠𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙗𝙚𝙡 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙠𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙠𝙖𝙨𝙞. 𝙉𝙖𝙢𝙪𝙣 𝙩𝙚𝙩𝙖𝙥𝙞 𝙨𝙖𝙟𝙖 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙝 𝙘𝙖𝙡𝙚𝙜 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙥𝙚𝙟𝙖𝙗𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙗𝙪𝙩, 𝙠𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙖 𝙙𝙞𝙠𝙖𝙨𝙞𝙝 𝙪𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙟𝙖𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙣 𝙠𝙖𝙩𝙖 - 𝙠𝙖𝙩𝙖.

𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙡𝙖𝙠𝙪 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠 𝙖𝙠𝙮𝙖𝙩 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖 𝙨𝙚𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙞 𝙞𝙣𝙞 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙙𝙞𝙢𝙖𝙠𝙨𝙪𝙙𝙠𝙖𝙣 𝙅𝙤𝙝𝙣 𝙍𝙖𝙬𝙡𝙨 𝙞𝙠𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙡𝙞𝙗𝙖𝙩 𝙙𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙢 𝙥𝙧𝙖𝙠𝙩𝙚𝙠 𝙠𝙤𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙨𝙞 𝙨𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙠. 𝙅𝙖𝙙𝙞 𝙠𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙪 𝙗𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙖𝙠 𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙩 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙥𝙚𝙟𝙖𝙗𝙖𝙩 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖 𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙞 𝙞𝙣𝙞 𝙢𝙚𝙡𝙖𝙠𝙪𝙠𝙖𝙣 𝙠𝙤𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙨𝙞 𝙙𝙖𝙣𝙖 𝙤𝙩𝙨𝙪𝙨 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙮𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙣 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙥𝙖𝙞 𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙡𝙮𝙪𝙣𝙖𝙣 𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙞𝙖𝙝, 𝙧𝙖𝙠𝙮𝙖𝙩 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙝 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙠𝙖, 𝙞𝙠𝙪𝙩 𝙟𝙪𝙜𝙖 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙡𝙞𝙗𝙖𝙩 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙞𝙠𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙞 𝙠𝙚𝙟𝙖𝙝𝙖𝙩𝙖𝙣 𝙡𝙪𝙖𝙧 𝙗𝙞𝙖𝙨𝙖 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙗𝙪𝙩.

𝘼𝙥𝙖𝙠𝙖𝙝 𝙥𝙧𝙖𝙠𝙩𝙚𝙠 𝙠𝙤𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙨𝙞 𝙨𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙠 𝙨𝙚𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙞 𝙞𝙣𝙞 𝙠𝙞𝙩𝙖 𝙢𝙖𝙨𝙞𝙝 𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙪𝙨 𝙡𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙠𝙖𝙣 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙬𝙖𝙩𝙣𝙮𝙖?.

𝙆𝙞𝙩𝙖 𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙪𝙨 𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙪𝙠𝙖𝙣 𝙥𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙝𝙖𝙣 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠 𝙠𝙞𝙩𝙖 𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙖𝙣 𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙛 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙗𝙞𝙟𝙖𝙠𝙨𝙖𝙣𝙖. 𝙋𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙝 𝘾𝙖𝙡𝙚𝙜 𝙖𝙩𝙖𝙪 𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙩 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙃𝙞𝙙𝙪𝙥𝙣𝙮𝙖 𝙏𝙖𝙠𝙪𝙩 𝙏𝙪𝙝𝙖𝙣 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙞 𝙠𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙚𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙞 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙜𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙨 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙪𝙟𝙞 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙗𝙪𝙠𝙩𝙞. 𝙎𝙚𝙟𝙖𝙪𝙝 𝙞𝙣𝙞, 𝙗𝙖𝙧𝙪 𝙖𝙙𝙖 𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙥𝙖 𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙩 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙪𝙝𝙞 𝙠𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙖 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙗𝙪𝙩.

𝙋𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧, 𝙘𝙚𝙧𝙙𝙖𝙨, 𝙥𝙖𝙝𝙖𝙢 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙚𝙨 𝙡𝙚𝙜𝙞𝙨𝙡𝙖𝙨𝙞 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙜𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙨 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙝𝙞𝙙𝙪𝙥 𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙪𝙩 𝙏𝙪𝙝𝙖𝙣, 𝙖𝙙𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙝 𝙠𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙖 𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙩 𝙖𝙩𝙖𝙪 𝙘𝙖𝙡𝙚𝙜 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙥𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙨 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙡𝙖𝙮𝙖𝙠 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙪𝙠 𝙙𝙞𝙥𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙝 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙢𝙚𝙬𝙖𝙠𝙞𝙡𝙞 𝙧𝙖𝙠𝙮𝙖𝙩 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖 𝙙𝙞 𝙧𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙝 𝙧𝙖𝙠𝙮𝙖𝙩, 𝙧𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙝 𝙋𝙖𝙧𝙡𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣. 𝙀𝙡𝙞𝙩 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙞𝙙𝙖𝙠 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙪𝙝𝙞 𝙠𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙖 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙗𝙪𝙩, 𝙟𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙖𝙣 𝙙𝙞𝙥𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙝.

𝙅𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙖𝙣 𝙥𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙝 𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙩 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙖𝙞 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙤𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙖𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙮𝙖 𝙙𝙪𝙞𝙩, 𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙖 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙠𝙚𝙝𝙞𝙙𝙪𝙥𝙖𝙣 𝙝𝙚𝙙𝙤𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙠. 𝘽𝙚𝙧𝙙𝙤𝙨𝙖 𝙠𝙞𝙩𝙖 𝙠𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙙𝙖 𝙏𝙪𝙝𝙖𝙣, 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙪𝙨𝙞𝙖 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙝 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙪𝙖 𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙖𝙣 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙝 𝘾𝙖𝙡𝙚𝙜 𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙡𝙞 𝙨𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙖, 𝙙𝙖𝙣 𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙖 𝙙𝙞𝙧𝙞 𝙠𝙞𝙩𝙖 𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙖𝙣 𝙪𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙣𝙚𝙜𝙖𝙧𝙖. 𝙐𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙝𝙖𝙨𝙞𝙡 𝙠𝙚𝙟𝙖𝙝𝙖𝙩𝙖𝙣 𝙠𝙤𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙮𝙖.